Media medical Malpractice

Sharing is caring!




Conservatives have decried the mainstream press as having tilted the playing field in favor of Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Specifically, they insurance claim that the media has ignored, belittled, or attacked those just asking the question, “Are secretary Clinton’s health and wellness issues a concern?”

Three polls provide credence to the concerns over media medical malpractice regarding the “Hillary’s Health” issue. as opposed to mainstream media reporters, Physicians as well as voters in general overwhelmingly have misgivings about Clinton’s health and wellness status.

image courtesy of
The very first was a poll of registered voters done by Gravis Marketing. This poll demonstrated that 45% of voters did not understand about Clinton’s 2012 head injury as well as that 69% did not understand she had a cerebral venous thrombosis (blood clot in the brain). one more 69% did not understand about Clinton’s episodes of deep vein thromboses. more than half of those polled were less likely to vote for Clinton after understanding she had these health and wellness issues.

What would an objective journalist do about a story such as this that is obviously important to the public as well as may have an effect on people’s voting? A legitimate news person would want the facts. The Clinton campaign has released a bit information: She has hypothyroidism, a concussion, two deep vein thromboses, a cerebral venous thrombosis (blood clot in the brain), as well as she is on Coumadin (a “blood thinner” that inhibits clotting) for the rest of her life. These conditions are widely known triggers of cognitive problems. provided the history of Clinton’s dissembling, as well as the propensity of the campaign to hide poor news, the skeptical reporter would question what worse news they may be holding back. Why has no mainstream media outlet requested the release of Clinton’s total medical records?

Related  meal Prep with Your youngsters with restricted Ingredients

The campaign has declared that any type of concerns are a politically inspired conspiracy theory or a hoax. A accountable journalist should investigate such an allegation before ignoring or suppressing health and wellness questions. Journalists likewise requirement to think about the views of physicians.

About 71% of the 250 physicians who responded to an Web survey stated they believed that Clinton’s health and wellness issues were “serious—could be disqualifying for the setting of president of the U.S.” almost 20% of respondents were not even conscious of Clinton’s understood 2012 diagnosis of concussion, as well as more than 40% of the respondents were not conscious of the diagnosed cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. only half understood about the two episodes of her deep venous thromboses. Furthermore, almost none of the Physicians (2.7%) felt comfortable relying on the letter from Clinton’s personal physician, Dr. Lisa Bardack. almost all Physicians desired the release of Clinton’s medical records (they likewise desired release of Donald Trump’s medical records).

Is the media trying to notify the public or change opinion?

The third, most recent poll asks physicians their viewpoint of videos showing Clinton’s eye motions during her public appearances. almost two-thirds of the approximately 100 respondents stated they saw eye motion abnormalities. Of those, the majority believed “the cause might be a potentially disabling neurological condition.” None specified an viewpoint that abnormalities they saw were of no neurological significance.

We understand that Clinton was treated for double vision in the past (She used prism lenses during the Benghazi Hearings), however we were told it resolved. It obviously hasn’t. We’ve not been provided any type of info about the cause, treatment, or present condition of her ocular problems.

Related  5 of the most costly products in Your Home

More telling than the increasing number of physicians doubting Clinton’s health and wellness is the lack of any type of doctor declaring that that there is no reason for concern. Clinton’s personal physician, Dr. Bardack, cannot be relied upon since she is constrained by honest as well as legal requirements. She cannot state anything publicly that is not authorized by her patient. While a sparse few physicians have stated that we shouldn’t judge from afar,Der har ikke været nogen læger, der er villige til at sætte deres omdømme på linjen for at oplyse, at Clintons sundhed og velvære er normal.

På dette tidspunkt, hvis pressen ignorerer, mindskler eller fornærmer dem, der øger bekymringerne over Clintons helbred, kan det muligvis kun blive generøst omtalt som mediemisbrug. En mere aggressiv fortolkning ville være pressebedrageri.

Link til dette indlæg: Media Media Media Media Mistic Malpractice


(0 anmeldelser)

Deling er omsorgsfuld!





Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *